Bitcoin's Awkward Age
Bitcoin’s Next Source of Structural Demand
How financial utility broadens structural demand on a fixed supply asset
Eighteen years after the whitepaper, Bitcoin’s monetary case is largely settled. Institutions now hold at least 3.9 million BTC, yet market performance has not kept pace with adoption.
This report examines the reasons behind that gap.
~ 1.5%
of Bitcoin supply active in lending and Bitcoin-native financial markets
up to 19,500 BTC
redistributed annually in an illustrative native yield scenario
US$ 2.8 to 5.6T
of financing linked to Bitcoin in illustrative liability management scenarios
What you’ll find in this report
Why fundamentals and price have diverged
How flows, leverage and positioning have obscured strengthening adoption and why long-term value follows structural demand.
What happens after monetary success
How gold, government bonds and property built financial markets on top of their monetary role without weakening it.
The two pillars of Bitcoin's financial utility
Institutional yield and liability management, and what Digital Asset Treasury companies show about Bitcoin-backed balance sheets.
Sizing the opportunity
Illustrative scenarios for up to 19,500 BTC redistributed annually through native yield and US$2.8 to 5.6 trillion of financing linked to Bitcoin.
Financial utility meets fixed supply
Why each new application adds an independent source of demand competing for 21 million BTC.
Tony Dicarlo
Director of Institutional Propositions, RootstockLabs
Tony leads the development and management of institutional Bitcoin strategies, commercial partnerships and financial propositions across treasury management, institutional yield, liquidity and capital markets.
Bitcoin's first fifteen years established its monetary identity. Its next fifteen may be defined by the financial utility built upon it.
Put Bitcoin to work Put Bitcoin to workPut Bitcoin to work Put Bitcoin to workPut Bitcoin to work Put Bitcoin to workPut Bitcoin to work Put Bitcoin to work
From Thesis to Balance Sheet
The report identifies institutional yield and liability management as the first two pillars of Bitcoin's financial utility. Each raises practical questions for institutions holding BTC and these are the areas RootstockLabs' team focuses on.
Explore how institutions are approaching these questions.
Treasury Management
Holding Bitcoin raises questions a buy-and-hold mandate does not answer, starting with how the position fits liquidity needs and risk limits.
Questions to answer before deploying BTC:
- Which part of the position is strategic, and which part can be deployed?
- Is the BTC held in segregated custody or available for rehypothecation?
- Where does any yield come from, and who carries the counterparty risk?
BTC-backed Credit
Borrowing against Bitcoin keeps the position intact. The rate is one input, and the collateral terms decide how the loan behaves when the price falls.
Questions to ask any lender:
- Is the collateral segregated, and can the lender rehypothecate it?
- At what LTV do margin calls and liquidation begin?
- What happens to pledged BTC if the lender becomes insolvent?
This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or solicitation of any product or service in any jurisdiction. It does not constitute investment, legal, tax or financial advice. Scenarios and figures are illustrative and do not represent forecasts. Past performance is not indicative of future results.